Commentaries can be used to:
- Provide additional context or background information on the article
- Discuss the implications of the article's findings
- Offer criticisms or suggestions for improvement
- Provide a different perspective on the article's findings
Commentaries can be a valuable way to add depth and nuance to the discussion of a research article. They can also help to promote critical thinking and debate about the findings of research.
Commentaries are not held in the same esteem as other journal articles. There are a few reasons why commentaries are not held in the same esteem as other journal articles.
- Commentaries are shorter and less rigorous. Commentaries are typically much shorter than research articles, and they do not typically involve the same level of original research. This can make them seem less valuable on your CV to some people.
- Commentaries are more subjective. Commentaries often involve the author's own interpretation of the research article, and they may be more likely to express personal opinions or beliefs. This can make them seem less objective than research articles.
- Commentaries are less likely to be peer-reviewed. Commentaries are often not peer-reviewed in the same way that research articles are. This means that they may not have been subjected to the same level of scrutiny, and they may contain errors or biases.